In every meeting, no matter the grade, teachers arrived at the same conclusion: Students chose the wrong answer because the format of the test questions was so unfamiliar and contrived that it threw them off.

The language was no everyday 7-year-old language. At least not in our community filled with students of all different colors and speakers of many different languages.

The test’s physical formatting differs from any authentic text students have encountered. Questions are organized horizontally across the exam page, but the scannable answer document is oriented vertically, in columns and too small for students to visually discriminate.

Some test proponents say getting students started with testing at a young age will prepare them to be good test-takers in the future, with advance placement and college entrance exams on the horizon. I don’t feel any testing, of this type, gives teachers or families a full picture of student ability and achievement.  

As we developed our instructional plans, we realized we were stuck. We wanted to prepare our students for success, but that meant we might be engaging in the most dreaded, most despised of all instructional practices: Teaching To The Test.

I just get so frustrated that nothing is really being done to change this test-motivated environment.  I think it flies in the face of almost everything we try to do as educators — especially on the side of students who struggle or have disabilities. We praise them all year for their successes, and then they take this one test which has the possibility to ruin all the self-confidence and pride they have gained.

"

A new federal study criticizes the Justice Department for failing to enforce laws that provide disabled students with special accommodations for taking the SAT, bar exam and other high-stakes tests.

People with disabilities such as visual impairment, dyslexia or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder say they are entitled to extra time, special software or other accommodations that will best ensure that the test reflects their aptitude rather than their disability.

Testing companies say they don’t have to provide accommodations if they think the requests are unreasonable, or if they think the applicant hasn’t proved they need the accommodation.

"

Test companies faulted on disabilities law 

GWALP adds:  Yet another testing-policy-related-thingy of which I am not surprised.  

(via girlwithalessonplan)

JBizzle adds: Does this company think that the IEP is a big freakin’ joke?  There is a specific section that is for testing. We don’t just put it in there for fun, it’s there for a reason.

(via jbizzle329)

My friend had to fight for accommodations for the Praxis II — the test you have to take in Ohio to become a teacher.  

(via jbizzle329)

You’re kidding me!

"As teachers we are taught not to compare students. So why then are politicians so focused on creating tests that compare students?"

@jaysonengland on twitter

I have some kids with high test anxiety.  Always looking for resources to give them or their parents since I don’t get to work with them nearly enough.